Why DallE-3 Won't Replace MidJourney: A Comprehensive Review and Comparison with MidJourney

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. The platforms mentioned, including DALL·E 3, MidJourney, Ideogram, and OpenAI, are referenced as examples and are trademarks of their respective owners. This blog is not affiliated with or endorsed by OpenAI, MidJourney, or Microsoft.

Why DALL·E 3 Won’t Replace MidJourney Anytime Soon

The world of AI image generation is moving fast, and OpenAI’s release of DALL·E 3 has certainly grabbed attention. With its integration into ChatGPT and Bing, many hailed it as a game-changer. But after testing it out extensively, I’ve realized that while DALL·E 3 is impressive in certain areas, it won’t replace MidJourney as the go-to tool for artistic and visually stunning creations anytime soon.

In this blog, we’ll explore the strengths and weaknesses of DALL·E 3, how it stacks up against MidJourney, and why MidJourney still remains the superior choice for creative work.

Getting Started with DALL·E 3

Accessing DALL·E 3 is simple. All you need is a free Microsoft account, which you can create using your Gmail. Once logged in, you can type a detailed prompt—something like:

“Extreme macro close-up, photorealistic, comical image. Adventurous couple mid-skydive, holding a floating breakfast table. Woman pours syrup, laughing. Cityscape, clouds. Whimsical white cursive text saying I Told You, Ever.”

Within seconds, DALL·E 3 generates four images to choose from. You can click on one to zoom in further.

However, there are restrictions. For example, prompts involving real people like Kevin Hart with The Rock often result in an error due to likeness and copyright limitations.

Strengths of DALL·E 3

Despite its limitations, DALL·E 3 has some notable strengths that set it apart from other AI tools.

1. Superior Natural Language Understanding

One of DALL·E 3’s strongest qualities is how well it interprets detailed prompts. If you ask for Kevin Hart next to The Rock, it usually produces accurate depictions of both individuals. MidJourney, on the other hand, often struggles, creating blended or distorted versions of characters.

2. Text-to-Image Generation

Unlike MidJourney, DALL·E 3 can generate legible text within images. For instance, asking it to create a sign that says “Don’t pet me!” works fairly well, though longer text prompts still cause errors. However, it only supports English, falling short compared to Ideogram, which can generate text in multiple languages.

3. Technical Photography Accuracy

When it comes to photography-based prompts—like fisheye lenses, low-angle shots, or long exposures—DALL·E 3 is remarkably accurate. While MidJourney creates beautiful visuals, it often prioritizes artistic appeal over technical correctness.

Where DALL·E 3 Falls Short

For all its strengths, DALL·E 3 still feels unfinished compared to MidJourney.

1. Limited Features

At the moment, DALL·E 3 is fairly basic. It only supports square images, with no options for adjusting aspect ratios. This makes full-body shots difficult, as the model often crops subjects awkwardly. MidJourney, by contrast, offers flexible ratios and its “pan” feature, which extends images seamlessly.

2. Aesthetic Appeal

This is where MidJourney shines. While DALL·E 3 delivers literal and technically accurate outputs, MidJourney consistently produces images with a more artistic and visually captivating style. For example, when asked to generate art in the style of Monet or Studio Ghibli, MidJourney’s results feel authentic and vibrant, while DALL·E 3 struggles to capture the nuances.

3. Missing Features Like Image History

One big frustration with DALL·E 3 is the lack of image history or storage. You can only view recent generations in a sidebar, making it hard to revisit or organize past work. MidJourney, on the other hand, offers better access and management of past creations.

4. Limited Character Consistency

Both models struggle with generating the same character across multiple prompts, but DALL·E 3—especially through ChatGPT integration—faces additional restrictions due to privacy and face recognition policies.

DALL·E 3 vs. MidJourney: Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature	DALL·E 3	MidJourney	Winner
Natural Language Understanding	Excellent, more accurate with prompts	Sometimes misinterprets prompts	DALL·E 3
Text in Images	Can generate text (English only)	Struggles with text	DALL·E 3
Aspect Ratios	Square only	Flexible ratios, pan & zoom features	MidJourney
Photography Accuracy	Captures technical details well	More artistic but less technical	DALL·E 3
Artistic Styles	Literal, struggles with niche artists	Captures styles like Monet, Studio Ghibli, Kazuki Takamasu	MidJourney
Aesthetic Appeal	Accurate but less creative	Visually stunning, artistic flair	MidJourney
Feature Set	Basic, still in beta	More advanced tools and flexibility	MidJourney
Languages	English only	Multilingual support	MidJourney
Image History	Lacks storage/search features	Easy to access and organize	MidJourney

👉 Verdict: DALL·E 3 shines in accuracy and text rendering, but MidJourney is still the better choice for art, creativity, and visual storytelling.

DALL·E 3 and ChatGPT Integration

The integration of DALL·E 3 into ChatGPT (via Bing and ChatGPT Plus) is exciting, but it doesn’t solve major issues like character consistency. Uploading faces for re-use in different scenarios isn’t possible due to privacy restrictions. For now, MidJourney still offers more flexibility, even though character consistency remains a challenge for both platforms.

Final Thoughts

DALL·E 3 is undoubtedly a leap forward in natural language understanding and text-to-image generation. It excels at accuracy, identity preservation, and photography realism. However, its limited features, weaker aesthetics, and lack of flexibility mean it won’t be replacing MidJourney anytime soon.

If you need precise prompts, readable text in images, or technical photo accuracy, DALL·E 3 is worth exploring. But if you’re after artistic quality, creative freedom, and stunning visuals, MidJourney still reigns supreme.

The competition between these tools is only heating up—and for creators, that means more choices and better AI art in the future.